Prototype. An accessible redesign concept for the Johnson County District Court, prepared by Stoa as a redesign concept. Not the live court website.
10th Judicial District of Kansas 150 W. Santa Fe St, Olathe, KS 66061 (913) 715-3300 Accessibility Español
Johnson County District Court 10th Judicial District · Olathe, Kansas

RFP fit and CMS proof

A click-through map from Attachment A requirements to the prototype pages and the proposed Drupal implementation.

Evaluator shortcut. This page maps the clickable prototype to Attachment A requirements. It is not a substitute for the proposal; it is the working proof behind it.

What the prototype demonstrates

RFP itemPrototype proofProduction CMS plan
Home page and audience-focused navigationHomeDrupal homepage, audience taxonomy, alerts, popular tasks, source-backed content.
Contacts templateContact and directoryDirectory content type grouped by role, location, court level, phone, and office.
Department page templateCourt ServicesProgram groups, owner/reviewer fields, document metadata, review dates, audience tags.
Judge/division listJudges & DirectorySearchable, filterable judicial and staff directory; Active Directory automation stays the optional opportunity the Q&A describes.
Daily docket / Central Case Management integration (required scope per Addendum 1)Daily DocketHourly ingestion of the Tyler Odyssey report (the pattern in the County’s Q&A), validated and published each hour, live at initial launch.
Dynamic news, RSS, and event calendarCalendarNews/event content types with RSS feeds, publish/expire dates, and audience targeting.
Nominating Commission siteCommissionSecond-site routing for jocojnc.org with shared CMS governance and analytics.
Metadata-driven search and document librariesSearchDrupal Search API/Solr-ready architecture indexing pages and documents (PDF, Word, Excel, PowerPoint) per site, with metadata, synonyms, and facets.
WCAG 2.1 AA (confirmed in Addendum 1), WCAG 2.2 preferred, ACRAccessibilityAutomated scanning that verifies WCAG 2.1 AA as required, plus manual keyboard/screen-reader QA, ACR, and document guidance.
Multilingual support (top languages: Spanish, Arabic, Portuguese, Mandarin)Self-Help Center en españolDrupal core multilingual (~100 languages, right-to-left included) with per-language editorial workflow; the Spanish self-help page demonstrates the pattern.
Online payments for non-case fees (Attachment B 5.11, in scope per Q&A)Court Services payment patternDrupal payment integration with the County’s Alacriti platform for record-request fees and attorney registration.
Attachment B and Attachment CCompleted upload files in proposal packetAttachment B CMS matrix (updated per Addendum 1) and Attachment C security checklist submitted separately.
No initial pricingNo public bid price shown hereCost requested only of interviewed finalists, per Attachment A and the Q&A; priced then on Cost Proposal Worksheet_v2.

Addendum 1 and the published Q&A, reflected here

The County published Addendum 1 and 184 question-and-answer responses on June 9, 2026. The prototype and proposal were updated the same day to match.

Addendum 1 / Q&A item and where it is addressed.
What the County clarifiedHow this submission responds
Daily docket integration is required scope; Odyssey hourly report is the working patternDocket page models the hourly Odyssey feed; included in base scope, live at launch.
Browser standard is current Microsoft Edge plus one prior version (replacing IE)Attachment B 1.3 updated to Included; templates target current Edge, Chrome, Firefox, and Safari.
WCAG 2.1 AA confirmed (2.2 preferred); automated scanning tool requiredAccessibility page; scanning workflow verifies WCAG 2.1 AA, with manual and assistive-technology QA included beyond the requirement.
Alacriti payments for non-case fees are in scopeAttachment B 5.11 updated to Included; payment pattern noted on Court Services.
Top four languages: Spanish, Arabic, Portuguese, MandarinSpanish Self-Help demonstration; Drupal core multilingual with right-to-left support covers all four.
90 percent or more of content remains; vendor remediates all active content before launchMigration plan sized to the full retained corpus with document remediation and a redirect map preserving existing URLs.
10 contributors and 5 approvers at go-live; MFA required for both rolesCMS roles, training, and MFA enforcement sized to exactly that team.
Two sites stay separate; single joint go-live; four environmentsShared CMS and design system across courts.jocogov.org and jocojnc.org; dev/test/staging/production; one launch.

CMS, governance, and analytics proof points

Workflow

Draft, review, approve, publish, expire, redirect, and archive states for court content owners, with one approver before publish per the Q&A.

Analytics

Usage, search terms, failed searches, docket lookups, document downloads, and service-demand dashboards.

Migration

Inventory both sites from source (granted after award), plan for 90 percent retention, remediate active pages and documents, and preserve URLs with redirects.

Training

Role-specific CMS training sized for the Court’s 10 contributors and 5 approvers, virtual-first, with recorded walkthroughs and 60 days of post-launch knowledge transfer.